Category Archives: Web/Tech

Living without cable TV

Ever since I moved up North, I’ve been cable TV-free. Now, that’s only one week, and much of that time’s been spent unpacking, buying stuff for my new place, and getting acquainted with my new job.

But I think I’ll stick with the zero-cable program for a bit. No more HD, no more digital cable, no more DVR.

I’ve got 13 low-def channels. Not the 13 I’d pick (Headline News? Ugh!), but that’s OK. I can catch a Sunday NFL game or two in real time (no DVR), stumble upon a show (I caught the first 10 minutes of an episode of “Glee” and found it surprisingly funny, but then I got a phone call), and otherwise live the antiquated life of our TV-watching forefathers and mothers.

I’m not a huge TV watcher anyway. My tube vices are “The Office,” “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia,” sports (football, hoops, baseball, soccer), and “Law and Order.”

“The Office,” for one, is available online. And if there’s a game I’m dying to watch, I can always find a sports bar or mooch off of one of my friends (or my parents, an hour away).

And I’ve still got Netflix. I mean, I’m not a complete monk.

Paying for the news — or not

Hey news consumer, can you spare a dime?

That’s what newspaper editors quoted in this Editor and Publisher story are asking.

As newspapers scramble to decide how best to increase revenue online, editors are desperately trying to figure out what content to charge for, while still keeping print viable and their Web numbers up.

Most newsroom leaders who spoke with E&P said no decisions have been made but admit they welcome a paid approach to online, noting that readers seem to be willing to pay for Web content that is useful, exclusive and/or in-depth. In each region, however, the definition of marketable content varies. Some editors believe everything is chargeable. Others point at sports, or find blogs and analysis the most sellable.

It’s an interesting story, and explores difficult questions.

I am, of course, without answers, but I’m watching the debate with interest.

As a career newspaperperson until very recently, I’ve been pondering my role as a news consumer. I was surfing the Web site of my former employer, the Knoxville News Sentinel, via my phone while having lunch at Valparaiso University’s Harre Union just today.

Would I pay a small amount of money to gain access to currently free knoxnews.com content if it was entirely behind a paywall? I’m pretty sure I would, both to support the good folks at the KNS and because I’m genuinely interested in Knoxville news, though I no longer live there and don’t have family or deep roots in the Southeast.

But would I pay more than a little? And how much would be the dealbreaking point? And what if the pay process was unwieldy or annoying? Would I just bail?

And there are more questions on the flip side. OK, so newspapers keep content free. How would the News Sentinel target advertising to me? Does it need to? Am I a valuable piece of the online readership puzzle in terms of my utility to advertisers?

In the Editor and Publisher story, several news execs seem to favor a tiered approach: some stuff free, more specialized or unusual or useful content behind a paywall. But where’s the right balance? What should be free? And, most importantly, will consumers pay?

Steve Dahl, Phil Rosenthal, and Chicago

I grew up in South Bend, Ind., on the fringes of the Chicago media market. And I worked as a sports writer and news editor in Michigan City, Ind., which is about 40 minutes from The Loop.

When I think of Chicago, I think of three guys: Steve Dahl, Phil Rosenthal, and Roger Ebert. Steve, a radio icon, has been off the air for many months. I’m very much looking forward to his return. His podcast is set to launch today.

And I am looking forward to moving back to the Midwest.

I’m wishing Steve all the best, and I’m excited to move back to northern Indiana.

Notre Dame football goes 12-1, disappoints fans

In my inaugural season of “NCAA 10,” I was cruising to a national championship, driving Notre Dame to a 9-0 record, when all of a sudden the train got derailed by Pitt, 42-38. I thought we might win it all. Despite the loss, the Irish went on to finish 11-1 to end the regular season, and trounced Cincinnati 38-13 in the Fiesta Bowl.

I’m sure many virtual fans were quite happy, while an equal number were wondering why exactly we didn’t win the national championship.

To that, I reply: There’s always next year.

Nd0909

No Facebook for Bill Gates

The Microsoft mega-titan says that he’s quit Facebook because he ended up with “10,000 people wanting to be my friends.”

Whole story via Yahoo.

And good for him, I say to this quote: “I read a lot and some of that reading is not on a computer.”

Contrast that with Apple’s Steve Jobs, who famously told the New York Times, when talking about the Amazon Kindle: “It doesn’t matter how good or bad the product is, the fact is that people don’t read anymore,” he said. “Forty percent of the people in the U.S. read one book or less last year. The whole conception is flawed at the top because people don’t read anymore.”